ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL CASES AND FUNDAMENTAL BASES FOR SOLVING THE SAFETY PROBLEMS OF EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN CHILDBIRTH

Authors

  • N. V. Titarenko
  • I. L. Kukuruza
  • I. A. Mogilevkina
  • A. I. Datsyuk
  • G. V. Bevz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31379/2411.2616.11.1.11

Keywords:

childbirth, epidural analgesia, patient safety

Abstract

In modern obstetrical practice, the maternal request is considered as a sufficient medical indication to alleviate pain during childbirth. At the same time, the increased use of epidural analgesia to control pain in childbirth occasionally provokes controversy about its effect on childbirth and their duration, the frequency of instrumental obstetric care and the cesarean section and may also be associated with an increased frequency of complications. The complications associated with the anesthesia of childbirth are quite rare. A significant place in their structure probably take mistakes related to the human factor, which may be caused by the insufficient competence of the obstetrician and/or anesthesiologist in matters of obstetric analgesia and anesthesia, and the lack or inadequacy of information support. Proper risk management is likely to reduce the percentage of human errors by 60– 87%. This article presents an analysis of 2 cases of vaginal parturitions in conditions of epidural analgesia and outlines the fundamental bases for solving the safety problems of epidural analgesia in childbirth from the perspective of evidence-based medicine, namely: the need to develop and implement a standardized approach to the epidural analgesia and monitoring the status of the mother and fetus; the introduction of new more safer technologies for epidural analgesia for the anesthesia of childbirth, including the use of PCA — patient controlled analgesia; use of modern technical and medical equipment; training and information support of specialists.

References

Ткаченко Р. А. Обезболивание родов: история и современность. Медичні аспекти здоров’я жінки. 2016. № 3 (100). С. 11–14.

Lederman P., Lederman G., Work B. A., Mc. Cann D. S. The relationship of maternal anxiety, plasma catecholamine and plasma cortisol to progress in labor. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 1978. Vol. 132, N 5. P. 495–500.

Osterman M. J., Martin J. A. Epidural and spinal anesthesia use during labor: 27-state reporting area, 2008. Natl. Vital. Stat. Rep. 2011. Vol. 59, N 5. P. 1–13.

D’Angelo R., Smiley R. M., Riley E. T., Segal S. Serious complications related to obstetric anesthesia: the serious complication repository project of the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology. 2014. Vol. 120, N 6. P. 1505–1512.

Кобеляцкий Ю. Ю., Ефремова Л. В. Обезболивание родов в условиях новой акушерской доктрины [Текст]. Острые и неотложные состояния в практике врача. 2009. № 4. С. 49–56.

Committee on Practice Bulletins — Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 177: Obstetric Analgesia and Anesthesia. Committee on Practice Bulletins. Obstetrics. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017. Vol. 129, N 4. P. e73–e89.

Cook T. M., Counsell D., Wildsmith J. A. W. Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2009. Vol. 102, N 2. P. 179–190.

Management of accidental dural puncture and postdural puncture headaches after labour: a Nоrdic survey / B. Darvish et al. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011. Vol. 55, N 1. P. 46–53.

Kelly A., Tran Q. The Optimal Pain Management Approach for a Laboring Patient: A Review of Current Literature. Cureus. 2017. Vol. 9, N 5. P. e1240.

Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2016. Vol. 124, N 2. P. 270–300.

Sultan P., Murphy C., Halpern S., Carvalho B. The effect of low concentrations versus high concentrations of local anesthetics for labour analgesia on obstetric and anesthetic outcomes: a meta-analysis. Can. J. Anaesth. 2013. Vol. 60, N 9. P. 840–854.

COMET Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. COMET Study Group UK. Lancet. 2011. Vol. 358, N 9275. P. 19–23.

Anim-Somuah M., Smyth R., Jones L., Anim-Somuah M. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour (Review). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011. Issue 12. CD000331.

Lee L., Dy, J. Azzam H. Management of Spontaneous Labour at Term in Healthy Women. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2016. Vol. 38, N 9. P. 843–865.

Anwar S., Anwar M. W., Ahmad S. Effect of epidural analgesia on labor and its outcomes. J. Ayub. Med. Coll. Abbottabad. 2015. Vol. 27, N 1. P. 146–150.

Published

2022-02-14

How to Cite

Титаренко, Н. В., Кукуруза, И. Л., Могилевкина, И. А., Дацюк, А. И., & Бевз, Г. В. (2022). ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL CASES AND FUNDAMENTAL BASES FOR SOLVING THE SAFETY PROBLEMS OF EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN CHILDBIRTH. Clinical Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, (1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.31379/2411.2616.11.1.11